<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: US Christian flag?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://godnix.wordpress.com/2007/06/18/us-christian-flag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://godnix.wordpress.com/2007/06/18/us-christian-flag/</link>
	<description>Where everything comes together</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:01:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nicteis</title>
		<link>http://godnix.wordpress.com/2007/06/18/us-christian-flag/comment-page-1/#comment-1719</link>
		<dc:creator>nicteis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 17:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://godnix.wordpress.com/2007/06/18/us-christian-flag/#comment-1719</guid>
		<description>The key contrast between flag and comment lies in J. Phil Wilson&#039;s observation that &quot;Nations cannot sacrifice themselves for the good of others&quot;, and the assertion on the flag site that the cross in the eagle&#039;s talon&#039;s is meant to signify America &quot;taking up the cross.&quot;

At first that bit of symbolism struck me as kind of sweetly naive. This country, spiritually awakened, could do an awful lot for the world without carrying its cross very far compared to, say,  the widow giving her mite. 

But since the site offers no suggestion as to what national policies might constitute &quot;taking up the cross&quot;, I&#039;m left wondering whether the site&#039;s designers may have confused the Gospel&#039;s &quot;take up the cross&quot;  with Kipling&#039;s &quot;take up the white man&#039;s burden.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key contrast between flag and comment lies in J. Phil Wilson&#8217;s observation that &#8220;Nations cannot sacrifice themselves for the good of others&#8221;, and the assertion on the flag site that the cross in the eagle&#8217;s talon&#8217;s is meant to signify America &#8220;taking up the cross.&#8221;</p>
<p>At first that bit of symbolism struck me as kind of sweetly naive. This country, spiritually awakened, could do an awful lot for the world without carrying its cross very far compared to, say,  the widow giving her mite. </p>
<p>But since the site offers no suggestion as to what national policies might constitute &#8220;taking up the cross&#8221;, I&#8217;m left wondering whether the site&#8217;s designers may have confused the Gospel&#8217;s &#8220;take up the cross&#8221;  with Kipling&#8217;s &#8220;take up the white man&#8217;s burden.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
